UF/IFAS Researchers Address Issues Facing Indoor Farms

Clint ThompsonFlorida

Across the globe, people are increasingly turning to greenhouses and indoor vertical farms to grow commodities. The systems use far less land than conventional farms, reducing some environmental impacts, University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences researchers say.

An indoor farm. Courtesy, UF/IFAS.

They also require less transportation to move the food to consumers, because they tend to be in or near urban areas, and their food tends to be safer.

Also known as controlled-environmental agriculture (CEA) — or “plant factories with artificial lighting” — they can help boost food production in urban and drought-prone regions.

In Florida, indoor farms can be found in such places as Tampa, The Villages, Jacksonville and Miami, said Ziynet Boz, a UF/IFAS assistant professor of agricultural and biological engineering.

On the flipside, indoor farms and greenhouses are expensive to start and maintain. It requires between $50 to $150 per square foot to build a greenhouse. For a 10,000-square foot greenhouse, that equates to $500,000 to $1.5 million, UF/IFAS researchers said.

That doesn’t include electricity, which accounts for 20% to 30% of operational costs.

Boz led a newly published paper that examined research on the sustainability challenges faced by those growing crops and ornamental plants through CEA.

Main Challenges

The main challenges for indoor operations are:

  • High electricity use, relative to traditional farming.
  • Geography-related tradeoffs after the indoor farm is built. For example, extreme temperatures impact the effectiveness of the climate control system and the cost. Rural areas may also be cheaper but may require more transportation.
  • Unfavorable public perception of CEA in comparison to field production. Consumers perceive “plant factories” as unnatural systems, and they want transparency.

“These issues are now being addressed by optimized lighting and sensor technology, decision-support tools to reduce electricity use and communications tactics to educate people about the benefits of CEA,” Boz said. “By addressing challenges, farmers and researchers can improve the sustainability, efficiency and yield of CEA operations.”

Boz credits the majority of the research on the paper to two agricultural and biological engineering doctoral students – Donald Coon and Lauren Lindow.

Now that he’s participated in this research, Coon has long-term suggestions for operators of indoor farms.

“Engage all three dimensions of sustainability – environmental, economic and social,” he said. “Produce a profitable product with minimal adverse impact and listen and respond to what the consumers are looking for. Focusing on just one of those at a time is inefficient and risky.”

Source: UF/IFAS